H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Petra Langrova vs Sandra Dopfer H2H: 2-1
Petra Langrova holds a 2–1 lead over Sandra Dopfer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Petra Langrova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1997 Cardiff fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1997* | Cardiff | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 6-3 6-4 | Sandra Dopfer | Match data |
| Sep 19, 1996* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Petra Langrova | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Sandra Dopfer | Match data |
| Sep 13, 1996* | Karlovy Vary | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sandra Dopfer | 6-2 6-4 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sandra Dopfer | #644 | #70 | 283 | 1,577 | 31 | 72 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Langrova | Sandra Dopfer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #208 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #130 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #210 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #112 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #99 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #90 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #112 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |