H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anna Zaporozhanova holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Mandula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna Zaporozhanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Zaporozhanova won the 2000 Tashkent round of 16 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Zaporozhanova | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Petra Mandula | Match data | Jun 16, 2000* | R16 | Tashkent | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Mandula | #417 | #30 | 963 | 1,717 | 69 | 81 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Zaporozhanova | #743 | #209 | 114 | 1,516 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Mandula | Anna Zaporozhanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #211 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #156 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #90 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #283 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Petra Mandula | Anna Zaporozhanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1483 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.16 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1508 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.88 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.26 |
| 21 | 1999 | 1516 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +61 | — | 47.6% | +0.10 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–2 | — | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1466 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +83 | — | 33.3% | -1.30 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1559 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -112 | +103 | — | 49.0% | -0.25 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 1580 | 116.5 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +119 | — | 48.7% | -0.44 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–3 (70%) | 101.7 | +0.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2003 | 1693 | 129.7 | +0.86 | +1.55 | 1.124 | 52.5% | -117 | +76 | — | 57.8% | +0.41 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.2 | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 1602 | 126.8 | -1.23 | +1.53 | 1.037 | 50.8% | -104 | +175 | — | 43.5% | -0.17 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–6 (40%) | 98.4 | +1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1575 | 90.3 | +0.39 | -1.63 | 0.841 | 46.3% | -91 | — | — | 22.2% | -2.67 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1718 | 121.9 | +0.10 | +1.12 | 1.052 | 51.1% | -90 | +107 | — | 47.7% | -0.26 | 24–28 (46%) | 16–17 (48%) | 101.3 | +1.77 | — | 1517 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.73 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +10.50 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 15, 2004 | H2H |
| Magui Serna | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 12, 2004 | H2H |
| Anastasia Myskina | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 9, 2002 | H2H |
| Francesca Schiavone | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 26, 2002 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 17, 2000 | H2H |
| Petra Mandula | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jun 16, 2000 | H2H |
| Na Li | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jun 15, 2000 | H2H |
| Tatiana Panova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 10, 1999 | H2H |