H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Petra Mandula vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 0-1
Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Mandula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 1999 Tashkent fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1999* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laurence Courtois | 7-5 6-2 | Petra Mandula | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Mandula | #417 | #30 | 963 | 1,712 | 69 | 79 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Petra Mandula | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #156 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #90 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #283 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |