H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Petra Mandula vs Miho Saeki H2H: 0-1

Miho Saeki holds a 1–0 lead over Petra Mandula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miho Saeki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miho Saeki won the 2002 Shanghai round of 16 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3.

HUN Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miho Saeki #171 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 Petra Mandula #85 Match data Sep 13, 2002* R16 Shanghai Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Mandula #417 #30 963 1,717 69 81 46.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miho Saeki #884 #56 461 1,579 26 57 31.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Mandula Miho Saeki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1995 0–2 0.0% #234 1,480 0 0
20 1996 3–7 30.0% #120 1,487 0 0
21 1999 4–4 50.0% #109 1,515 0 0 1997 5–12 29.4% #76 1,488 0 0
22 2000 4–12 25.0% #156 1,465 0 0 1998 9–15 37.5% #89 1,512 0 0
23 2001 10–9 52.6% #62 1,559 0 0 1999 6–11 35.3% #119 1,525 0 0
24 2002 16–18 47.1% #90 1,580 0 0
25 2003 22–17 56.4% #40 1,692 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #179 1,500 0 0
26 2004 12–18 40.0% #81 1,602 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #201 1,499 0 0
27 2005 1–3 25.0% #283 1,574 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #256 1,473 0 0
28 2004 1–1 50.0% #260 1,489 0 0
29 2005 0–1 0.0% #210 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Mandula Miho Saeki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 3 7 10 30.0%
21 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2003 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2004 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2004 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2005 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 22 43 65 33.8% 45 32 77 58.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 21 41 62 33.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Mandula Miho Saeki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1995 1480 98.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.09
20 1996 1487 103.2 +21 31.8% -1.59 1–1 2–0 +0.13
21 1999 1516 104.6 +4 +61 47.6% +0.10 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +0.52 1997 1489 122.4 +41 38.1% -0.95 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 98.6 +0.43
22 2000 1466 102.3 +13 +83 33.3% -1.30 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.20 1998 1513 115.8 +31 +52 39.3% -0.88 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 +0.99
23 2001 1559 115.4 -112 +103 49.0% -0.25 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) -0.22 1999 1525 118.8 +30 42.5% -0.47 1–5 (17%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +0.08
24 2002 1580 116.5 -103 +119 48.7% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 101.7 +0.73
25 2003 1693 129.7 +0.86 +1.55 1.124 52.5% -117 +76 57.8% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.2 +0.21 2001 1500 98.0 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 +0.22
26 2004 1602 126.8 -1.23 +1.53 1.037 50.8% -104 +175 43.5% -0.17 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 +1.08 2002 1500 91.2 +3 30.8% -1.39 1–0 0–3 (0%) -0.20
27 2005 1575 90.3 +0.39 -1.63 0.841 46.3% -91 22.2% -2.67 1–0 +0.11 2003 1474 98.3 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.02
28 2004 1489 102.8 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 -0.17
29 2005 1472 89.7 0.0% -5.50 +0.25
Career 1718 121.9 +0.10 +1.12 1.052 51.1% -90 +107 47.7% -0.26 24–28 (46%) 16–17 (48%) 101.3 +1.77 1580 114.0 +29 +52 36.4% -1.06 9–20 (31%) 13–13 (50%) 95.9 +1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.