H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Petra Mandula vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-1

Petra Mandula and Miriam Oremans are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on clay, while Petra Mandula leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Petra Mandula won the 2002 US Open round of 128 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Petra Mandula
HUN Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Mandula #90 4-6 6-4 6-2 Miriam Oremans #102 Match data Aug 28, 2002* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Miriam Oremans #100 6-3 6-1 Petra Mandula #107 Match data May 12, 2000* R16 Warsaw Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Petra Mandula #417 #30 963 1,717 69 81 46.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Petra Mandula Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 1999 4–4 50.0% #109 1,515 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 2000 4–12 25.0% #156 1,465 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 2001 10–9 52.6% #62 1,559 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2002 16–18 47.1% #90 1,580 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2003 22–17 56.4% #40 1,692 0 0 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 2004 12–18 40.0% #81 1,602 0 0 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 2005 1–3 25.0% #283 1,574 0 0 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Petra Mandula Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2003 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2004 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
Career — 22 43 65 33.8% 45 32 77 58.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Petra Mandula Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 1999 1516 104.6 — — — — +4 +61 — 47.6% +0.10 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.52 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 2000 1466 102.3 — — — — +13 +83 — 33.3% -1.30 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.20 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 2001 1559 115.4 — — — — -112 +103 — 49.0% -0.25 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2002 1580 116.5 — — — — -103 +119 — 48.7% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 101.7 +0.73 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2003 1693 129.7 +0.86 +1.55 1.124 52.5% -117 +76 — 57.8% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.2 +0.21 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 2004 1602 126.8 -1.23 +1.53 1.037 50.8% -104 +175 — 43.5% -0.17 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 +1.08 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 2005 1575 90.3 +0.39 -1.63 0.841 46.3% -91 — — 22.2% -2.67 1–0 — — +0.11 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
Career — 1718 121.9 +0.10 +1.12 1.052 51.1% -90 +107 — 47.7% -0.26 24–28 (46%) 16–17 (48%) 101.3 +1.77 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.