H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pilar Vasquez vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 1-0
Pilar Vasquez holds a 1–0 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1988 Guaruja quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1988* | Guaruja | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Pilar Vasquez | 6-3 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pilar Vasquez | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |