Pilar Vasquez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Patricia Medrado | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 3, 1984 | H2H |
| Kim Steinmetz | 4 | 1 | 5 | Sep 15, 1983 | H2H |
| Anne Minter | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1990 Tokyo Dentsu round of 32 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data | Sep 28, 1990* | R32 | Tokyo Dentsu | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data | Jan 14, 1987* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,799 | 94 | 130 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,850 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pilar Vasquez | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 15–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,695 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,543 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,421 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Pilar Vasquez | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1980 | — | — | — | — | 15 | 0 | 15 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1986 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1984 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 1985 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1987 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1990 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1988 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1989 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1990 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1993 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 1991 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1994 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 34 | 59 | 93 | 36.6% | 37 | 51 | 88 | 42.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% | Career | 125 | 129 | 254 | 49.2% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 33 | 33 | 66 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Pilar Vasquez | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1696 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +93 | — | 100.0% | +3.97 | — | 1–0 | — | +2.78 | 1983 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 1981 | 1709 | 135.2 | — | — | — | — | -147 | +84 | — | 64.9% | +1.14 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.3 | -0.42 | 1984 | 1478 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 1982 | 1623 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | -51 | +27 | — | 44.8% | -0.50 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +1.03 | 1985 | 1542 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 63.2% | +0.89 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 1983 | 1612 | 111.0 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +14 | — | 44.1% | -0.47 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.9 | +3.38 | 1986 | 1683 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | +1.30 |
| 1984 | 1544 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -1 | — | 35.2% | -1.17 | 1–5 (17%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.6 | +0.59 | 1987 | 1659 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | -85 | 41.9% | -0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.83 |
| 1985 | 1438 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | +88 | +8 | — | 20.0% | -2.73 | 0–4 (0%) | — | — | +0.36 | 1988 | 1587 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | -37 | 37.3% | -1.03 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.4 | -1.05 |
| 1986 | 1408 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | +93 | -5 | — | 25.0% | -2.33 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.42 | 1989 | 1592 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.25 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.6 | +2.41 |
| 1987 | 1482 | 106.8 | — | — | — | — | +84 | -100 | — | 45.7% | -0.30 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–0 | — | +1.44 | 1990 | 1746 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -257 | — | 51.7% | +0.10 | 7–10 (41%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.1 | -0.70 |
| 1988 | 1510 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -101 | — | 39.5% | -0.95 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.40 | 1991 | 1740 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -243 | -169 | 48.9% | -0.13 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.3 | +0.98 |
| 1989 | 1498 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | -7 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.07 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.62 | 1992 | 1697 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | -146 | 48.5% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.1 | +0.32 |
| 1990 | 1474 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -57 | — | 36.4% | -1.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.4 | +1.73 | 1993 | 1749 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -270 | -150 | 51.6% | +0.31 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.6 | -0.37 |
| 1991 | 1409 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | — | 16.0% | -2.28 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.15 | 1994 | 1773 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -260 | -181 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.29 |
| 1993 | 1422 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.13 | 1995 | 1788 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -292 | — | 54.1% | +0.31 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.2 | +0.06 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1666 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -192 | — | 31.6% | -1.28 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.43 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1673 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 52.6% | +0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| Career | 1800 | 115.2 | — | — | — | — | +17 | +22 | — | 44.4% | -0.47 | 24–39 (38%) | 18–16 (53%) | 97.2 | +5.63 | Career | 1850 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -251 | -124 | 47.3% | -0.20 | 63–57 (53%) | 39–25 (61%) | 108.6 | +0.74 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Arraya | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jan 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 2 | 5 | 7 | Apr 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Patricia Medrado | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 3, 1984 | H2H |
| Kim Steinmetz | 4 | 1 | 5 | Sep 15, 1983 | H2H |
| Anne Minter | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 17, 1996 | H2H |