H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pilar Vasquez vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-2
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1990 Tokyo Dentsu third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1990* | Tokyo Dentsu | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Jan 14, 1987* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pilar Vasquez | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |