H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pilar Vasquez vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 0-1
Nicole Jagerman holds a 1–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1988 Wellington second round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1988* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Nicole Jagerman | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pilar Vasquez | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |