H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 1-1
Rachel Mcquillan and Barbara Paulus are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Paulus won the 1996 Key Biscayne second round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1996* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Paulus | 7-5 6-3 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1991* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Rachel Mcquillan | 6-4 6-7(7) 6-4 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rachel Mcquillan | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |