H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 1-0
Rachel Mcquillan holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 1989 Hamburg second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1989* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Rachel Mcquillan | 7-5 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rachel Mcquillan | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |