H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Fang Li H2H: 1-1
Rachel Mcquillan and Fang Li are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Key Biscayne first round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1998* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Fang Li | 7-6 6-2 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1994* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Rachel Mcquillan | 6-4 6-3 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rachel Mcquillan | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |