H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-1
Rachel Mcquillan and Helena Sukova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on clay, while Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 1992 Rome third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Rachel Mcquillan | 7-5 6-4 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1988* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Helena Sukova | 7-5 6-2 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rachel Mcquillan | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |