H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-1
Rachel Mcquillan and Julie Halard-Decugis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 1994 Brisbane third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1994* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Rachel Mcquillan | 6-3 6-2 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1993* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 7-6 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rachel Mcquillan | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |