H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Liz Smylie H2H: 1-1
Rachel Mcquillan and Liz Smylie are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1990 Schenectady third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1990* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Liz Smylie | 6-4 6-0 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1990* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Rachel Mcquillan | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rachel Mcquillan | Liz Smylie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 |