H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Rachel Mcquillan vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 2–0 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1995 Eastbourne second round 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Lori Mcneil #23 4-6 6-2 6-1 Rachel Mcquillan #76 Match data
Mar 15, 1993* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #21 2-6 6-3 6-3 Rachel Mcquillan #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 195 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,624 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,709 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1992 18–13 58.1% #38 1,752 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,573 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,650 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,668 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1996 2–9 18.2% #186 1,568 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,647 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,529 0 0 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,521 0 0 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,464 0 0 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,507 0 0 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,462 0 0 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,453 0 0 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11