H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-0
Rachel Mcquillan holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Strandlund Tomsvik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 1991 Hamburg second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1991* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Rachel Mcquillan | 6-3 6-4 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rachel Mcquillan | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |