H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rachel Mcquillan vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 0-2

Nicole Bradtke holds a 2–0 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1992 Brisbane International final 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Bradtke #45 6-3 6-2 Rachel Mcquillan #36 Match data Jan 5, 1992* F Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Nicole Bradtke #54 6-0 6-1 Rachel Mcquillan #42 Match data May 16, 1990* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0
18 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1
23 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2
24 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2
25 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3
26 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3
28 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Nicole Bradtke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
19 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1% — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Nicole Bradtke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25
16 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05
17 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69
18 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02
19 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32
20 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63
21 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07
22 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67
23 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27
24 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
25 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62
26 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45
27 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02
28 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53 — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.