H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rachel Mcquillan vs Patty Fendick H2H: 2-1

Rachel Mcquillan holds a 2–1 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Rachel Mcquillan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rachel Mcquillan won the 1995 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rachel Mcquillan #88 6-3 7-5 Patty Fendick #59 Match data Mar 18, 1995* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Rachel Mcquillan #70 6-3 2-6 6-3 Patty Fendick #37 Match data Jun 22, 1994* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Patty Fendick #31 6-2 6-2 Rachel Mcquillan #73 Match data Apr 15, 1994* R16 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0
21 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3
26 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3
28 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3
30 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3
31 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Patty Fendick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
28 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0%
29 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1% — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Patty Fendick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32
18 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97
19 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32
20 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32
21 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36
22 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36
23 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37
24 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33
25 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10
26 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64
27 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86
28 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37
29 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50
30 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51
31 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53 — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.