H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Rachel Mcquillan vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-3

Sandra Cecchini holds a 3–2 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1993 Rome second round 6-1 6-3.

AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 1993* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Sandra Cecchini #28 6-1 6-3 Rachel Mcquillan #62 Match data
Oct 26, 1989* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sandra Cecchini #21 6-4 7-5 Rachel Mcquillan #72 Match data
Sep 16, 1989* Athens WTA 250 QF Clay Rachel Mcquillan #92 6-3 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #32 Match data
May 11, 1989* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Sandra Cecchini #22 2-6 7-5 7-5 Rachel Mcquillan #78 Match data
May 5, 1989* Hamburg WTA 250 R16 Clay Rachel Mcquillan #127 6-3 4-6 7-6 Sandra Cecchini #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 195 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,477 0 0
17 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,624 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,485 0 0
18 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,709 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,497 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1992 18–13 58.1% #38 1,752 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,573 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,650 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,668 0 0 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1996 2–9 18.2% #186 1,568 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,647 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,529 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,521 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,464 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,507 0 0 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,462 0 0 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,453 0 0 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11