H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rachel Mcquillan vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-3

Sandra Cecchini holds a 3–2 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1993 Italian Open round of 64 6-1 6-3.

AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 3
5 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #28 6-1 6-3 Rachel Mcquillan #62 Match data May 5, 1993* R64 Italian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Sandra Cecchini #21 6-4 7-5 Rachel Mcquillan #72 Match data Oct 26, 1989* R32 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Rachel Mcquillan #92 6-3 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #32 Match data Sep 16, 1989* QF Athens WTA 250 Clay
Sandra Cecchini #22 2-6 7-5 7-5 Rachel Mcquillan #78 Match data May 11, 1989* R32 Italian Open WTA 500 Clay
Rachel Mcquillan #127 6-3 4-6 7-6 Sandra Cecchini #20 Match data May 5, 1989* R16 Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,477 0 0
17 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,484 0 0
18 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,496 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1999 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 2002 2 7 9 22.2% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
32 1997 4 7 11 36.4%
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
Career 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1% 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1988 1525 105.3 +33 +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.46 1981 1478 96.3 0.0% -4.00 -0.07
17 1989 1628 133.6 -84 +68 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04 1982 1484 101.9 +37 44.4% +0.11 1–0 +0.65
18 1990 1710 138.1 -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35 1983 1497 106.6 60.0% 0.00 0–1 +0.17
19 1991 1745 143.2 -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03 1984 1651 123.3 +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1992 1743 134.0 +48 +31 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56 1985 1747 132.3 -80 +43 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1993 1571 123.4 +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 0.00 1986 1633 120.0 -65 +149 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1994 1650 132.0 +20 -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52 1987 1859 148.1 -141 +79 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1995 1668 136.0 +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84 1988 1843 145.8 -149 +157 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1996 1564 118.6 +94 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32 1989 1799 128.9 -134 +134 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1997 1646 124.9 +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04 1990 1815 140.5 -136 +130 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1998 1528 122.7 +87 -7 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) -0.66 1991 1774 131.6 -138 +151 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1999 1521 111.6 +78 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 +0.09 1992 1824 136.5 -222 +141 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 2000 1464 94.4 +80 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.36 1993 1727 129.9 -151 +131 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 2001 1524 120.3 +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07 1994 1841 138.9 -123 +6 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 2002 1474 99.4 +43 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 +0.25 1995 1661 113.4 +36 +34 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 2003 1464 100.2 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.03 1996 1629 109.5 +14 +62 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 +1.57
32 1997 1608 106.4 +32 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 -0.39
33 1998 1555 95.4 +15 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 +0.33
Career 1826 136.8 +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53 1936 137.9 -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.