H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rachel Mcquillan vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 1-3

Shi-Ting Wang holds a 3–1 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1998 Hope Island round of 16 1-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rachel Mcquillan
AUS Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Shi-Ting Wang
TPE Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shi-Ting Wang #64 1-6 6-4 6-4 Rachel Mcquillan #54 Match data Jan 8, 1998* R16 Hope Island Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Rachel Mcquillan #186 6-7 6-4 6-3 Shi-Ting Wang #40 Match data Jan 2, 1997* R32 Hope Island Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shi-Ting Wang #35 6-1 2-6 6-2 Rachel Mcquillan #63 Match data Aug 25, 1994* R32 Schenectady Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Shi-Ting Wang #91 6-1 1-6 6-1 Rachel Mcquillan #42 Match data Aug 27, 1992* R32 Schenectady Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rachel Mcquillan #971 #28 582 1,826 163 197 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shi-Ting Wang #457 #26 707 1,831 129 106 54.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Shi-Ting Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
16 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1989 13–15 46.4% #79 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 27–21 56.2% #39 1,710 0 0 1992 12–12 50.0% #54 1,604 0 0
19 1991 26–20 56.5% #36 1,744 0 0 1993 21–9 70.0% #30 1,780 0 2
20 1992 18–14 56.2% #38 1,742 0 0 1994 21–12 63.6% #42 1,775 0 3
21 1993 13–23 36.1% #115 1,571 0 0 1995 17–9 65.4% #44 1,775 0 4
22 1994 20–17 54.1% #61 1,649 0 0 1996 26–16 61.9% #40 1,804 0 6
23 1995 13–16 44.8% #69 1,667 0 0 1997 15–18 45.5% #68 1,681 0 6
24 1996 2–10 16.7% #186 1,563 0 0 1998 13–17 43.3% #58 1,642 0 6
25 1997 10–10 50.0% #48 1,645 0 0 1999 4–11 26.7% #153 1,583 0 6
26 1998 3–15 16.7% #185 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1999 1–3 25.0% #160 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2000 0–4 0.0% #107 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2001 12–17 41.4% #79 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2002 2–7 22.2% #178 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2003 0–1 0.0% #355 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Shi-Ting Wang
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1988 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 3 8 11 27.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 10 5 15 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1991 9 6 15 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 18 6 24 75.0% — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1994 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1993 9 14 23 39.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 15 7 22 68.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1994 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1996 24 14 38 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 11 9 20 55.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 12 10 22 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 1997 9 5 14 64.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1998 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 108 202 46.5% 41 46 87 47.1% 12 25 37 32.4% 16 18 34 47.1% — 112 72 184 60.9% 10 18 28 35.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rachel Mcquillan Shi-Ting Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1492 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1479 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.10
16 1988 1525 105.3 — — — — +33 — +35 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1989 1628 133.6 — — — — -84 +68 — 52.3% +0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–7 (42%) 96.2 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1990 1710 138.1 — — — — -54 +68 -125 55.5% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 108.8 -1.35 1992 1605 131.1 — — — — +40 — — 50.9% +0.09 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.89
19 1991 1745 143.2 — — — — -36 +98 -162 56.1% +0.50 7–8 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 102.3 -1.03 1993 1780 139.9 — — — — +28 — — 65.7% +1.22 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 102.1 +0.48
20 1992 1743 134.0 — — — — +48 +31 — 57.7% +0.24 4–5 (44%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 +0.56 1994 1776 134.4 — — — — +9 -187 — 59.7% +0.78 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 102.0 +0.94
21 1993 1571 123.4 — — — — +47 +137 +1 43.7% -0.23 3–12 (20%) 0–5 (0%) — 0.00 1995 1776 128.1 — — — — -3 -152 — 62.3% +1.00 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — +1.57
22 1994 1650 132.0 — — — — +20 — -38 51.7% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.52 1996 1805 138.2 — — — — +7 -168 — 62.8% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 3–2 (60%) 96.0 +1.15
23 1995 1668 136.0 — — — — +64 -22 -89 46.9% -0.33 2–6 (25%) 4–0 (100%) 99.7 -0.84 1997 1682 134.5 — — — — +63 -61 -72 48.0% +0.09 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.92
24 1996 1564 118.6 — — — — +94 — — 25.9% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 -0.32 1998 1643 128.9 — — — — +100 -94 -61 44.4% -0.51 6–6 (50%) 1–0 — -0.80
25 1997 1646 124.9 — — — — +88 -103 -51 46.8% -0.11 5–2 (71%) 0–6 (0%) 99.4 +0.04 1999 1584 118.9 — — — — +82 -54 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -1.22
26 1998 1528 122.7 — — — — +87 -7 — 29.5% -0.93 1–7 (13%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1999 1521 111.6 — — — — +78 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2000 1464 94.4 — — — — +80 — — 27.3% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2001 1524 120.3 — — — — +71 -27 -53 43.5% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2002 1474 99.4 — — — — +43 — — 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–0 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2003 1464 100.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1826 136.8 — — — — +27 +53 -57 47.7% -0.13 47–72 (39%) 45–44 (51%) 97.6 -0.53 — 1832 139.5 — — — — +33 -105 -66 54.4% +0.34 36–38 (49%) 18–14 (56%) 99.8 +0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.