H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rachel Mcquillan vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 1-3
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 3–1 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Shi-Ting Wang leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1998 Hope Island fourth round 1-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1998* | Hope Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1997* | Hope Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rachel Mcquillan | 6-7 6-4 6-3 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1994* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1992* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-1 1-6 6-1 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rachel Mcquillan | Shi-Ting Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |