H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Radka Pelikanova vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 0-1

Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Radka Pelikanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1996 Budapest round of 32 6-2 6-0.

CZE Age 49 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-2 6-0 Radka Pelikanova #225 Match data May 9, 1996* R32 Budapest Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Radka Pelikanova #766 #180 114 1,522 1 6 14.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tami Whitlinger Jones 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Radka Pelikanova Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
18 1995 1–1 50.0% #222 1,506 0 0
19 1996 0–2 0.0% #286 1,483 0 0
20 1997 0–1 0.0% #227 1,469 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% 1,525 0 0
21 1998 0–1 0.0% #215 1,453 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% 1,576 0 0
22 1999 0–1 0.0% #235 1,445 0 0 1991 17–18 48.6% 1,682 0 0
23 1992 13–16 44.8% 1,644 0 0
24 1993 13–19 40.6% 1,650 0 0
25 1994 16–18 47.1% 1,709 0 0
26 1995 19–18 51.4% 1,700 0 0
27 1996 10–13 43.5% 1,694 0 0
28 1997 2–11 15.4% 1,596 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Radka Pelikanova Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1995 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1996 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Radka Pelikanova Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1494 100.7 0.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.05
18 1995 1507 101.0 60.0% +0.20 0–1 1–0 +0.06
19 1996 1483 93.6 0.0% -4.50 -0.01
20 1997 1470 99.1 0.0% -4.00 +0.09 1989 1525 121.7 +38 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49
21 1998 1453 99.1 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–2 +0.18 1990 1577 126.7 +71 -98 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78
22 1999 1446 97.2 0.0% -4.50 -0.08 1991 1682 133.2 -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08
23 1992 1645 120.9 +15 -10 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65
24 1993 1651 135.8 +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72
25 1994 1709 145.5 +28 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10
26 1995 1701 136.6 -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16
27 1996 1694 132.0 +28 -56 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18
28 1997 1596 120.8 +84 -20 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98
Career 1523 95.7 25.0% -2.06 0–2 1–2 (33%) +3.43 1778 139.7 +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.