H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Radomira Zrubakova vs Ann Grossman H2H: 2-1
Radomira Zrubakova holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Radomira Zrubakova leads 2–0 on clay, while Ann Grossman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radomira Zrubakova won the 1995 Rome second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1995* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Radomira Zrubakova | 6-4 6-3 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1994* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-2 6-2 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| May 3, 1992* | Taranto | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Radomira Zrubakova | 6-0 6-2 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radomira Zrubakova | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |