H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Radomira Zrubakova vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 1-1
Radomira Zrubakova and Bettina Fulco are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Fulco leads 1–0 on clay, while Radomira Zrubakova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radomira Zrubakova won the 1992 Boca Raton second round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1992* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Radomira Zrubakova | 7-6 6-1 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| May 29, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-2 6-1 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radomira Zrubakova | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |