H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Radomira Zrubakova vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 2-1
Radomira Zrubakova holds a 2–1 lead over Emanuela Zardo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Radomira Zrubakova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Radomira Zrubakova won the 1992 Lucerne semifinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 56
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 1992* | Lucerne | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Radomira Zrubakova | 6-4 6-4 | Emanuela Zardo | Match data |
| May 3, 1992* | Taranto | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Emanuela Zardo | 7-5 5-7 6-4 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1992* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Radomira Zrubakova | 6-1 6-0 | Emanuela Zardo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Emanuela Zardo | #976 | #27 | 80 | 1,765 | 69 | 74 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radomira Zrubakova | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #89 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |