H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Radomira Zrubakova vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 0-1
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 1–0 lead over Radomira Zrubakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1994 US Open second round 3-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Isabelle Demongeot | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radomira Zrubakova | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |