H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Radomira Zrubakova vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-3
Nana Smith holds a 3–0 lead over Radomira Zrubakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nana Smith leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1990 Key Biscayne second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 55
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1990* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nana Smith | 6-1 6-2 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nana Smith | 7-5 6-4 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1989 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nana Smith | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Radomira Zrubakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radomira Zrubakova | #788 | #22 | 324 | 1,896 | 171 | 155 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Radomira Zrubakova | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1987 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #32 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #23 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |