H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Andrea Temesvari holds a 5–1 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 5–0 on clay, while Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1989 Dallas round of 16 6-4 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data | Sep 22, 1989* | R16 | Dallas | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Andrea Temesvari | 6-2 6-1 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Apr 4, 1986* | R16 | Marco Island | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 7-6 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Jul 26, 1985* | QF | Indianapolis US Clay | WTA 500 | Clay |
| Andrea Temesvari | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Jan 26, 1984* | R32 | Marco Island | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Andrea Temesvari | 6-0 7-6 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | May 5, 1983* | R32 | Perugia | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Andrea Temesvari | 6-2 6-1 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | May 5, 1982* | R64 | Perugia | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 260 | 178 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Andrea Temesvari | — | #7 | 109 | 2,022 | 185 | 179 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,990 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,889 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 30–16 | 65.2% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,475 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,476 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,485 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,529 | 0 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 17 | 1983 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1983 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 29 | 5 | 34 | 85.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% |
| 18 | 1984 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1984 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 19 | 1985 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1985 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 20 | 1986 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1986 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1987 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1989 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 1990 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1992 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1992 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 101 | 67 | 168 | 60.1% | 102 | 57 | 159 | 64.2% | 23 | 17 | 40 | 57.5% | 34 | 34 | 68 | 50.0% | — | 44 | 57 | 101 | 43.6% | 89 | 62 | 151 | 58.9% | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 26 | 43 | 69 | 37.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1485 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 1421 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.1% | -2.39 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.24 | 1981 | 1624 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.5% | +0.97 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–2 | — | -0.16 |
| 16 | 1982 | 1414 | 94.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.03 | 1982 | 1772 | 146.5 | — | — | — | — | -152 | -31 | -162 | 59.2% | +0.69 | 3–6 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.6 | -3.02 |
| 17 | 1983 | 1669 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -51 | -56 | 47.3% | -0.21 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | 109.6 | 0.00 | 1983 | 1990 | 163.1 | — | — | — | — | -215 | +103 | -366 | 75.4% | +2.16 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.7 | +1.39 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1754 | 129.5 | — | — | — | — | -113 | +30 | -124 | 55.2% | 0.00 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–1 (80%) | 103.3 | -0.99 | 1984 | 1890 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +109 | -174 | 61.2% | +0.68 | 5–4 (56%) | 6–2 (75%) | 105.4 | +3.45 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1784 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | -146 | +128 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 11–6 (65%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.7 | +0.43 | 1985 | 1849 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | -48 | +129 | — | 61.5% | +0.86 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.7 | +1.41 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1897 | 151.9 | — | — | — | — | -62 | +67 | -239 | 57.6% | +0.70 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–2 (71%) | 105.3 | -1.96 | 1986 | 1802 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +157 | — | 55.1% | +0.29 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–3 (40%) | 94.1 | -0.74 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1904 | 144.7 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +25 | -206 | 62.5% | +0.81 | 9–9 (50%) | 5–0 (100%) | 99.9 | +0.52 | 1987 | 1776 | 105.3 | — | — | — | — | -39 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.29 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.17 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1912 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -21 | -182 | 61.0% | +0.50 | 9–4 (69%) | 6–2 (75%) | 106.8 | -1.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 1856 | 141.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +23 | -72 | 59.4% | +0.69 | 12–8 (60%) | 8–2 (80%) | 107.5 | +0.39 | 1989 | 1751 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | -31 | +153 | — | 50.0% | -0.01 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.1 | -0.31 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1816 | 143.0 | — | — | — | — | +36 | +79 | -27 | 61.5% | +0.89 | 12–5 (71%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.3 | +0.44 | 1990 | 1612 | 121.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +190 | — | 34.5% | -1.48 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 98.1 | +0.21 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1708 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +34 | +163 | — | 49.0% | -0.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.6 | +1.53 | 1991 | 1542 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +224 | +66 | 36.4% | -1.34 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.0 | +0.26 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1723 | 128.3 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +121 | — | 52.5% | -0.02 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–0 (100%) | 103.2 | -0.10 | 1992 | 1608 | 122.1 | — | — | — | — | -5 | +81 | +64 | 41.5% | -0.70 | 7–2 (78%) | 3–3 (50%) | 106.9 | +0.26 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1476 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | +134 | — | 28.8% | -1.37 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.7 | +0.66 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1477 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | +1 | +154 | — | 27.8% | -1.83 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.25 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1486 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | -22 | +124 | — | 43.8% | -0.38 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.7 | +1.71 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1532 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +113 | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.42 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1529 | 108.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.29 |
| Career | — | 1930 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +46 | -117 | 56.4% | +0.38 | 82–52 (61%) | 47–22 (68%) | 113.8 | -0.17 | — | 2022 | 143.4 | — | — | — | — | -57 | +117 | -111 | 52.6% | +0.18 | 42–48 (47%) | 33–38 (46%) | 97.5 | +1.11 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 10, 1991 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 25, 1987 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 13, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 9 | 9 | Aug 28, 1991 | H2H |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 5 | 1 | 6 | Sep 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 3 | 2 | 5 | Oct 15, 1993 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 14, 1993 | H2H |
| Helen Kelesi | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 19, 1992 | H2H |