H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Carrie Cunningham H2H: 1-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Carrie Cunningham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1990 Indianapolis third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-4 6-2 | Carrie Cunningham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Carrie Cunningham | #801 | #38 | 25 | 1,738 | 54 | 74 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Carrie Cunningham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #137 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #85 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #70 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #51 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #249 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #634 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |