H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Donna Faber H2H: 2-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1992 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1992* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-4 6-4 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1989* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |