H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Elna Reinach H2H: 3-1
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 3–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1989 Albuquerque fourth round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1989* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 7-5 7-6 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-6 6-7 6-4 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1988* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 7-6 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1988* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 7-5 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |