H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 6–0 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gabriela Sabatini leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1990 Canadian Open round of 16 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-1 6-0 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Aug 3, 1990* | R16 | Canadian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 6-1 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Mar 9, 1990* | R16 | Boca Raton | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-0 4-6 6-1 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Jan 25, 1989* | R16 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-7 6-1 6-4 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Feb 20, 1987* | R16 | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Jul 2, 1986* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 6-2 6-4 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data | Jul 12, 1984* | R32 | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,929 | 260 | 178 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,399 | 613 | 184 | 76.9% | 1 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 10 | 27 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #10 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,266 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 65–14 | 82.3% | #4 | 2,282 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,259 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,233 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,270 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | 1988 | 30–16 | 65.2% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,294 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,110 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,057 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,063 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | 1992 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #56 | 1,958 | 1 | 27 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 19 | 6 | 25 | 76.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 17 | 1983 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1987 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 22 | 5 | 27 | 81.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% |
| 18 | 1984 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1988 | 33 | 6 | 39 | 84.6% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% |
| 19 | 1985 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1989 | 25 | 5 | 30 | 83.3% | 21 | 3 | 24 | 87.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% |
| 20 | 1986 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1990 | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% |
| 21 | 1987 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1991 | 24 | 5 | 29 | 82.8% | 21 | 2 | 23 | 91.3% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% |
| 22 | 1988 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1992 | 28 | 6 | 34 | 82.4% | 23 | 2 | 25 | 92.0% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% |
| 23 | 1989 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1993 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 1990 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 23 | 8 | 31 | 74.2% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 25 | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1995 | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 26 | 1992 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 101 | 67 | 168 | 60.1% | 102 | 57 | 159 | 64.2% | 23 | 17 | 40 | 57.5% | 34 | 34 | 68 | 50.0% | — | 264 | 81 | 345 | 76.5% | 198 | 51 | 249 | 79.5% | 54 | 16 | 70 | 77.1% | 97 | 36 | 133 | 72.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1485 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 1984 | 1586 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +28 | — | 50.0% | -0.07 | 4–0 (100%) | 1–0 | — | +0.70 |
| 15 | 1981 | 1421 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.1% | -2.39 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.25 | 1985 | 1947 | 156.6 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +18 | -325 | 69.6% | +1.39 | 9–7 (56%) | 8–1 (89%) | 110.0 | +0.93 |
| 16 | 1982 | 1414 | 94.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1986 | 2024 | 163.4 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +46 | -252 | 66.7% | +1.36 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 102.6 | -4.53 |
| 17 | 1983 | 1668 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -51 | -55 | 47.3% | -0.21 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | 109.6 | -0.02 | 1987 | 2267 | 174.7 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -98 | -411 | 74.7% | +1.86 | 10–6 (63%) | 7–4 (64%) | 107.3 | -8.41 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1753 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | -112 | +30 | -123 | 55.2% | 0.00 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–1 (80%) | 103.3 | -1.00 | 1988 | 2283 | 175.5 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -24 | -387 | 77.7% | +2.15 | 12–7 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 101.3 | -6.45 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1783 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -146 | +128 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 11–6 (65%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.7 | +0.03 | 1989 | 2260 | 175.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | +41 | — | 74.8% | +2.16 | 16–3 (84%) | 2–5 (29%) | 102.9 | -4.81 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1896 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | -61 | +68 | -239 | 57.6% | +0.70 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–2 (71%) | 105.3 | -1.91 | 1990 | 2233 | 175.3 | — | — | — | — | +45 | +4 | -235 | 74.1% | +1.94 | 8–3 (73%) | 9–5 (64%) | 101.9 | -3.17 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1904 | 144.7 | — | — | — | — | -19 | +25 | -206 | 62.5% | +0.81 | 9–9 (50%) | 5–0 (100%) | 99.9 | -0.62 | 1991 | 2270 | 177.6 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +107 | -240 | 81.0% | +2.46 | 9–2 (82%) | 12–3 (80%) | 110.2 | -3.71 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1912 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -21 | -182 | 61.0% | +0.50 | 9–4 (69%) | 6–2 (75%) | 106.8 | -1.20 | 1992 | 2294 | 179.7 | — | — | — | — | -28 | +165 | -170 | 80.4% | +2.52 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.7 | -3.70 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1856 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +23 | -73 | 59.4% | +0.69 | 12–8 (60%) | 8–2 (80%) | 107.5 | +0.65 | 1993 | 2110 | 172.2 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +275 | -2 | 71.3% | +1.82 | 7–7 (50%) | 6–8 (43%) | 91.5 | -1.15 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1816 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | +36 | +78 | -27 | 61.5% | +0.89 | 12–5 (71%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.3 | +0.44 | 1994 | 2057 | 164.9 | — | — | — | — | +46 | +123 | -4 | 67.2% | +1.39 | 11–5 (69%) | 2–4 (33%) | 97.2 | -0.85 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1707 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +35 | +164 | — | 49.0% | -0.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.6 | +1.53 | 1995 | 2063 | 172.1 | — | — | — | — | +41 | +69 | +16 | 71.5% | +1.92 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–10 (38%) | 88.1 | +0.28 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1723 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +121 | — | 52.5% | -0.02 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–0 (100%) | 103.2 | -0.10 | 1996 | 1958 | 159.9 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 58.8% | +1.02 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.49 |
| Career | — | 1930 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +46 | -117 | 56.4% | +0.38 | 82–52 (61%) | 47–22 (68%) | 113.8 | -0.42 | — | 2400 | 176.6 | — | — | — | — | +4 | +66 | -221 | 73.0% | +1.86 | 109–59 (65%) | 68–55 (55%) | 104.0 | -4.44 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 10, 1991 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 25, 1987 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 13, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 11 | 28 | 39 | Sep 9, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 12 | 11 | 23 | Sep 23, 1995 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 13 | 10 | 23 | Sep 7, 1995 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 6 | 15 | 21 | Nov 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 12 | 6 | 18 | Aug 19, 1995 | H2H |