H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Hu Na H2H: 1-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1986 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-2 6-4 | Hu Na | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Hu Na | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |