H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Jana Novotna H2H: 2-1

Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–1 lead over Jana Novotna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 2–0 on clay, while Jana Novotna leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1989 Brighton quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Raffaella Reggi Concato
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jana Novotna
CZE Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jana Novotna #10 6-3 6-1 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data Oct 28, 1989* QF Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-2 6-2 Jana Novotna #104 Match data May 15, 1987* R16 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay
Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-3 2-6 7-5 Jana Novotna #144 Match data Apr 4, 1987* SF Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Raffaella Reggi Concato — — — 1,929 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Jana Novotna #18 #2 5,063 2,240 510 201 71.7% 1 2 1 13 7 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Jana Novotna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,413 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 21–20 51.2% — 1,668 0 0 1986 0–4 0.0% #171 1,466 0 0
18 1984 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0 1987 21–17 55.3% #47 1,752 0 0
19 1985 26–19 57.8% — 1,783 0 1 1988 24–19 55.8% #35 1,760 0 1
20 1986 31–20 60.8% — 1,896 0 3 1989 45–17 72.6% #11 1,963 0 2
21 1987 39–21 65.0% — 1,903 0 4 1990 40–16 71.4% #13 2,017 0 3
22 1988 30–16 65.2% — 1,911 0 4 1991 45–15 75.0% #7 2,071 0 5
23 1989 39–22 63.9% — 1,855 0 4 1992 36–18 66.7% #10 2,080 0 5
24 1990 31–16 66.0% — 1,816 0 5 1993 46–15 75.4% #6 2,101 0 7
25 1991 11–11 50.0% — 1,707 0 5 1994 43–11 79.6% #4 2,141 0 10
26 1992 14–12 53.8% — 1,723 0 5 1995 30–12 71.4% #11 2,031 0 11
27 — — — — — — — 1996 52–13 80.0% #3 2,226 0 15
28 — — — — — — — 1997 52–15 77.6% #2 2,176 0 19
29 — — — — — — — 1998 50–14 78.1% #3 2,131 1 23
30 — — — — — — — 1999 26–15 63.4% #18 1,925 1 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Jana Novotna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 11 8 19 57.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
21 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1990 21 9 30 70.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1991 23 5 28 82.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6%
23 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1992 6 4 10 60.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 11 5 16 68.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 6 1 7 85.7% 18 4 22 81.8%
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1994 21 5 26 80.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 2 14 85.7%
26 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 17 6 23 73.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 6 3 9 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 18 5 23 78.3% 13 3 16 81.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 15 3 18 83.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 11 5 16 68.8% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 1 10 90.0% 21 5 26 80.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 14 5 19 73.7% 16 5 21 76.2% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 9 7 16 56.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
Career — 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0% — 185 77 262 70.6% 122 57 179 68.2% 76 20 96 79.2% 127 47 174 73.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Jana Novotna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1981 1421 91.5 — — — — — — — 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1414 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1668 126.0 — — — — +22 -51 -55 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 -0.02 1986 1467 99.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–2 0–1 — +0.11
18 1984 1753 129.4 — — — — -112 +30 -123 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -1.00 1987 1752 144.9 — — — — -44 -97 -159 54.0% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 106.7 -1.10
19 1985 1783 138.4 — — — — -146 +128 — 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.03 1988 1761 136.2 — — — — -22 -139 -14 54.6% +0.31 6–5 (55%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 -1.23
20 1986 1896 151.8 — — — — -61 +68 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.91 1989 1964 163.3 — — — — -23 -80 -211 72.3% +1.50 6–9 (40%) 9–3 (75%) 102.7 -1.47
21 1987 1904 144.7 — — — — -19 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 -0.62 1990 2017 161.3 — — — — -58 -59 -100 69.2% +1.75 8–10 (44%) 2–10 (17%) 91.7 -0.57
22 1988 1912 144.0 — — — — +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.20 1991 2072 167.7 — — — — +35 -34 -157 70.2% +1.55 9–6 (60%) 7–9 (44%) 100.2 -3.27
23 1989 1856 141.4 — — — — -4 +23 -73 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.65 1992 2080 166.9 — — — — +61 -79 -110 65.2% +1.13 5–7 (42%) 3–6 (33%) 97.1 -2.23
24 1990 1816 142.9 — — — — +36 +78 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44 1993 2101 165.8 — — — — +7 -93 -22 71.2% +1.78 10–7 (59%) 3–9 (25%) 94.2 -0.26
25 1991 1707 117.7 — — — — +35 +164 — 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53 1994 2141 164.9 — — — — -4 -150 -80 74.8% +1.88 8–3 (73%) 0–3 (0%) 98.5 +0.48
26 1992 1723 128.2 — — — — +7 +121 — 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10 1995 2032 157.0 — — — — +26 -87 +85 66.3% +1.14 9–5 (64%) 2–5 (29%) 95.1 -0.21
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2227 173.1 — — — — -19 -153 -20 72.9% +1.64 12–6 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 110.0 -2.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2177 170.8 — — — — +3 -94 +101 69.9% +1.51 20–9 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 96.6 -1.15
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2131 164.1 — — — — -27 -24 +279 75.2% +1.56 10–9 (53%) 11–3 (79%) 99.3 -0.45
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1926 151.5 — — — — +61 +51 +418 60.2% +0.60 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +0.16
Career — 1930 143.8 — — — — -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.42 — 2240 168.7 — — — — 0 -77 +15 68.1% +1.33 114–86 (57%) 68–75 (48%) 96.3 -1.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.