H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Karen Huebner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1984 US Open round of 128 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-2 6-0 | Karen Huebner | Match data | Aug 30, 1984* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,929 | 260 | 178 | 59.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Karen Huebner | — | — | — | 1,528 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | Karen Huebner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 30–16 | 65.2% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | Karen Huebner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 101 | 67 | 168 | 60.1% | 102 | 57 | 159 | 64.2% | 23 | 17 | 40 | 57.5% | 34 | 34 | 68 | 50.0% | Career | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | Karen Huebner | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1980 | 1485 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 1980 | 1501 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.56 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +1.49 |
| 1981 | 1421 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 23.1% | -2.39 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.25 | 1981 | 1490 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 |
| 1982 | 1414 | 94.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 | 1982 | 1520 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +60 | — | 53.3% | +0.13 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +1.32 |
| 1983 | 1668 | 126.0 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -51 | -55 | 47.3% | -0.21 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | 109.6 | -0.02 | 1983 | 1515 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.25 | 0–2 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.30 |
| 1984 | 1753 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | -112 | +30 | -123 | 55.2% | 0.00 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–1 (80%) | 103.3 | -1.00 | 1984 | 1508 | 94.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.06 |
| 1985 | 1783 | 138.4 | — | — | — | — | -146 | +128 | — | 54.2% | +0.26 | 11–6 (65%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.7 | +0.03 | 1985 | 1491 | 93.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.19 |
| 1986 | 1896 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | -61 | +68 | -239 | 57.6% | +0.70 | 10–6 (63%) | 5–2 (71%) | 105.3 | -1.91 | 1986 | 1475 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 1987 | 1904 | 144.7 | — | — | — | — | -19 | +25 | -206 | 62.5% | +0.81 | 9–9 (50%) | 5–0 (100%) | 99.9 | -0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1912 | 144.0 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -21 | -182 | 61.0% | +0.50 | 9–4 (69%) | 6–2 (75%) | 106.8 | -1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1856 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +23 | -73 | 59.4% | +0.69 | 12–8 (60%) | 8–2 (80%) | 107.5 | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1816 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | +36 | +78 | -27 | 61.5% | +0.89 | 12–5 (71%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.3 | +0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1707 | 117.7 | — | — | — | — | +35 | +164 | — | 49.0% | -0.35 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.6 | +1.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1723 | 128.2 | — | — | — | — | +7 | +121 | — | 52.5% | -0.02 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–0 (100%) | 103.2 | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1930 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -14 | +46 | -117 | 56.4% | +0.38 | 82–52 (61%) | 47–22 (68%) | 113.8 | -0.42 | Career | 1528 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | +69 | +60 | — | 42.4% | -0.82 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.0 | +12.81 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 2, 1992 | H2H |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 2 | 6 | 8 | Feb 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 10, 1991 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 0 | 8 | 8 | Apr 25, 1987 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 13, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tina Mochizuki | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 14, 1983 | H2H |
| Kathleen Cummings | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 2, 1980 | H2H |
| Monique Javer | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 24, 1986 | H2H |
| Amy Holton | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 21, 1985 | H2H |
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 30, 1984 | H2H |