H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Katerina Maleeva H2H: 0-4
Katerina Maleeva holds a 4–0 lead over Raffaella Reggi Concato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Katerina Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Katerina Maleeva won the 1990 US Open third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-4 6-0 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| Nov 5, 1989* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Katerina Maleeva | 6-4 6-4 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| Dec 12, 1985* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Katerina Maleeva | 6-3 7-6 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1985* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Katerina Maleeva | 6-2 6-3 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Katerina Maleeva | #456 | #6 | 116 | 2,070 | 324 | 185 | 63.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Katerina Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,838 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,992 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 32–11 | 74.4% | #15 | 1,940 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,039 | 0 | 9 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,906 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #22 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,866 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #302 | 1,679 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #231 | 1,686 | 0 | 11 |