H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1991 Key Biscayne second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1989* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |