H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Louise Stacey H2H: 1-0

Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Stacey in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1989 Australian Open round of 128 6-2 7-6(3).

ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-2 7-6(3) Louise Stacey Match data Jan 18, 1989* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Raffaella Reggi Concato 1,929 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Louise Stacey 1,500 0 5 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Louise Stacey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% 1,484 0 0
15 1981 0–5 0.0% 1,421 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,413 0 0
17 1983 21–20 51.2% 1,668 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
18 1984 17–14 54.8% 1,753 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% 1,479 0 0
19 1985 26–19 57.8% 1,783 0 1 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,473 0 0
20 1986 31–20 60.8% 1,896 0 3 1992 0–2 0.0% 1,455 0 0
21 1987 39–21 65.0% 1,903 0 4
22 1988 30–16 65.2% 1,911 0 4
23 1989 39–22 63.9% 1,855 0 4
24 1990 31–16 66.0% 1,816 0 5
25 1991 11–11 50.0% 1,707 0 5
26 1992 14–12 53.8% 1,723 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Louise Stacey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1981 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1992 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
23 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
26 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Louise Stacey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1485 95.1 0.0% -4.50 +0.13
15 1981 1421 91.5 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) +0.25
16 1982 1414 94.1 0.0% -4.50 -0.02
17 1983 1668 126.0 +22 -51 -55 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 -0.02 1989 1497 105.9 0.0% -2.50 0–1 -0.19
18 1984 1753 129.4 -112 +30 -123 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -1.00 1990 1480 98.2 0.0% -2.00 +0.26
19 1985 1783 138.4 -146 +128 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.03 1991 1473 99.8 33.3% -0.67 0–1 -0.04
20 1986 1896 151.8 -61 +68 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.91 1992 1456 96.2 20.0% -2.60 0–1 +0.03
21 1987 1904 144.7 -19 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 -0.62
22 1988 1912 144.0 +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.20
23 1989 1856 141.4 -4 +23 -73 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.65
24 1990 1816 142.9 +36 +78 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44
25 1991 1707 117.7 +35 +164 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53
26 1992 1723 128.2 +7 +121 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10
Career 1930 143.8 -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.42 1500 99.9 16.7% -2.00 0–2 0–1 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.