H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 1-1
Raffaella Reggi Concato and Maria Strandlund Tomsvik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on clay, while Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1990 Oklahoma third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1990* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 6-3 | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | Match data |
| May 26, 1988* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |