H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1990 Toronto third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1990 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-1 6-0 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |