H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 1-1
Raffaella Reggi Concato and Meredith Mcgrath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1991 Key Biscayne third round 1-6 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1991* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 1-6 6-1 6-0 | Meredith Mcgrath | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1989* | Wichita | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Meredith Mcgrath | 6-4 6-2 | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Meredith Mcgrath | #315 | #18 | 898 | 1,927 | 90 | 84 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Meredith Mcgrath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #780 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #39 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #62 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #26 | 1,917 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |