H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-0

Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1988 Oklahoma round of 32 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Raffaella Reggi Concato
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Raffaella Reggi Concato 7-6 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Feb 25, 1988* R32 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Raffaella Reggi Concato — — — 1,929 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,421 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,413 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1983 21–20 51.2% — 1,668 0 0 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1984 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1985 26–19 57.8% — 1,783 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1986 31–20 60.8% — 1,896 0 3 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1987 39–21 65.0% — 1,903 0 4 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1988 30–16 65.2% — 1,911 0 4 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1989 39–22 63.9% — 1,855 0 4 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1990 31–16 66.0% — 1,816 0 5 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1991 11–11 50.0% — 1,707 0 5 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1992 14–12 53.8% — 1,723 0 5 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1981 1421 91.5 — — — — — — — 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) — — +0.25 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 1982 1414 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1983 1668 126.0 — — — — +22 -51 -55 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 -0.02 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1984 1753 129.4 — — — — -112 +30 -123 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -1.00 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1985 1783 138.4 — — — — -146 +128 — 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1896 151.8 — — — — -61 +68 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.91 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1987 1904 144.7 — — — — -19 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 -0.62 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1988 1912 144.0 — — — — +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.20 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1989 1856 141.4 — — — — -4 +23 -73 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.65 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1990 1816 142.9 — — — — +36 +78 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1991 1707 117.7 — — — — +35 +164 — 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1992 1723 128.2 — — — — +7 +121 — 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1930 143.8 — — — — -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.42 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.