H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Petra Langrova H2H: 2-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Langrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1992 Pattaya third round 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1992* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-4 6-0 | Petra Langrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Petra Langrova | #895 | #53 | 453 | 1,701 | 81 | 117 | 40.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Petra Langrova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #86 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #66 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |