H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 3-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 3–0 lead over Pilar Vasquez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1991 Linz fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1991* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-1 6-1 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 6-0 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
| May 4, 1983* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-4 6-3 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |