H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 2-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 2–0 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1986 Hilversum fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1986* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-1 6-2 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| May 11, 1985* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 6-3 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 |