H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Regina Rajchrtova H2H: 1-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Regina Rajchrtova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1989 Brighton third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1989* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-3 6-3 | Regina Rajchrtova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Regina Rajchrtova | #340 | #26 | 32 | 1,798 | 63 | 65 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Regina Rajchrtova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #212 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |