H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-2

Raffaella Reggi Concato and Sandra Cecchini are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–1 on clay, while Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1992 Key Biscayne second round 6-0 6-4.

Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 1992* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-0 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #29 Match data
Sep 26, 1987* Hamburg WTA 250 QF Clay Sandra Cecchini #28 6-3 1-6 6-4 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data
May 12, 1985* Barcelona WTA 250 F Clay Sandra Cecchini #58 6-3 6-4 Raffaella Reggi Concato Match data
Apr 4, 1985* Seabrook Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-3 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Raffaella Reggi Concato 1,930 256 176 59.3% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% 1,497 0 0
15 1981 0–5 0.0% 1,431 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,424 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,477 0 0
17 1983 21–20 51.2% 1,671 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,485 0 0
18 1984 17–14 54.8% 1,754 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,497 0 0
19 1985 26–19 57.8% 1,783 0 1 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1986 31–20 60.8% 1,896 0 3 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1987 39–21 65.0% 1,903 0 4 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1988 27–15 64.3% 1,872 0 4 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1989 39–22 63.9% 1,863 0 4 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1990 31–16 66.0% 1,818 0 5 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1991 11–11 50.0% 1,708 0 5 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1992 13–11 54.2% 1,719 0 5 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11