H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Sandra Wasserman H2H: 4-0

Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 4–0 lead over Sandra Wasserman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1990 Brentwood round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Raffaella Reggi Concato
ITA Age 60 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Sandra Wasserman
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-4 6-4 Sandra Wasserman #100 Match data Nov 2, 1990* R16 Brentwood Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-2 6-2 Sandra Wasserman #76 Match data Aug 30, 1990* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Raffaella Reggi Concato 7-6 6-4 Sandra Wasserman #66 Match data Mar 7, 1990* R64 Boca Raton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Raffaella Reggi Concato 6-4 6-4 Sandra Wasserman #53 Match data May 11, 1989* R32 Italian Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Raffaella Reggi Concato — — — 1,929 260 178 59.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Sandra Wasserman #747 #48 22 1,701 77 93 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Sandra Wasserman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1981 0–5 0.0% — 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,413 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 21–20 51.2% — 1,668 0 0 1987 7–4 63.6% #123 1,596 0 0
18 1984 17–14 54.8% — 1,753 0 0 1988 19–18 51.4% #63 1,643 0 0
19 1985 26–19 57.8% — 1,783 0 1 1989 18–17 51.4% #69 1,632 0 0
20 1986 31–20 60.8% — 1,896 0 3 1990 12–17 41.4% #103 1,607 0 0
21 1987 39–21 65.0% — 1,903 0 4 1991 6–10 37.5% #131 1,583 0 0
22 1988 30–16 65.2% — 1,911 0 4 1992 3–8 27.3% #135 1,538 0 0
23 1989 39–22 63.9% — 1,855 0 4 1993 8–11 42.1% #112 1,556 0 0
24 1990 31–16 66.0% — 1,816 0 5 1994 4–8 33.3% #198 1,540 0 0
25 1991 11–11 50.0% — 1,707 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 1992 14–12 53.8% — 1,723 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Sandra Wasserman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 13 8 21 61.9% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 13 7 20 65.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1987 11 5 16 68.8% 20 10 30 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1989 20 11 31 64.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1990 22 12 34 64.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 101 67 168 60.1% 102 57 159 64.2% 23 17 40 57.5% 34 34 68 50.0% — 42 43 85 49.4% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Raffaella Reggi Concato Sandra Wasserman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1981 1421 91.5 — — — — — — — 23.1% -2.39 0–3 (0%) — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1414 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1668 126.0 — — — — +22 -51 -55 47.3% -0.21 9–2 (82%) 3–4 (43%) 109.6 -0.02 1987 1596 125.6 — — — — — +39 — 64.0% +1.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.79
18 1984 1753 129.4 — — — — -112 +30 -123 55.2% 0.00 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 -1.00 1988 1644 115.1 — — — — -32 +14 -112 51.1% +0.01 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +4.28
19 1985 1783 138.4 — — — — -146 +128 — 54.2% +0.26 11–6 (65%) 4–5 (44%) 102.7 +0.03 1989 1633 118.0 — — — — +44 -43 — 50.6% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 0–5 (0%) 96.1 +3.24
20 1986 1896 151.8 — — — — -61 +68 -239 57.6% +0.70 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 -1.91 1990 1608 122.9 — — — — +64 -90 — 44.1% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 98.4 -0.61
21 1987 1904 144.7 — — — — -19 +25 -206 62.5% +0.81 9–9 (50%) 5–0 (100%) 99.9 -0.62 1991 1583 107.2 — — — — +19 -21 — 36.1% -1.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +0.37
22 1988 1912 144.0 — — — — +15 -21 -182 61.0% +0.50 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 106.8 -1.20 1992 1539 107.3 — — — — +30 +11 — 33.3% -1.13 0–2 0–1 — +0.37
23 1989 1856 141.4 — — — — -4 +23 -73 59.4% +0.69 12–8 (60%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 +0.65 1993 1556 112.7 — — — — +1 +2 — 42.9% -0.43 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.49
24 1990 1816 142.9 — — — — +36 +78 -27 61.5% +0.89 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 100.3 +0.44 1994 1540 109.0 — — — — -5 — — 30.8% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.21
25 1991 1707 117.7 — — — — +35 +164 — 49.0% -0.35 4–3 (57%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 +1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1723 128.2 — — — — +7 +121 — 52.5% -0.02 4–3 (57%) 4–0 (100%) 103.2 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 143.8 — — — — -14 +46 -117 56.4% +0.38 82–52 (61%) 47–22 (68%) 113.8 -0.42 — 1702 120.3 — — — — +26 -5 -112 45.9% -0.30 25–29 (46%) 16–19 (46%) 95.3 +5.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.