H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Raffaella Reggi Concato vs Veronika Martinek H2H: 1-0
Raffaella Reggi Concato holds a 1–0 lead over Veronika Martinek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raffaella Reggi Concato leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raffaella Reggi Concato won the 1988 Brussels third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 54
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1988* | Brussels | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Raffaella Reggi Concato | 6-1 6-0 | Veronika Martinek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffaella Reggi Concato | — | — | — | 1,930 | 256 | 176 | 59.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Veronika Martinek | #530 | #49 | 177 | 1,664 | 73 | 104 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Raffaella Reggi Concato | Veronika Martinek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #160 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 31–20 | 60.8% | — | 1,896 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #61 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 39–21 | 65.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 39–22 | 63.9% | — | 1,863 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #143 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |