H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Regina Marsikova vs Eva Krapl H2H: 1-0
Regina Marsikova holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Krapl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Regina Marsikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1986 US Open first round 0-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1986* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Regina Marsikova | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | Eva Krapl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Regina Marsikova | Eva Krapl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |