H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Regina Marsikova vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 0-2
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 2–0 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gabriela Sabatini leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1986 Lugano third round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1986* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1986* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-1 6-0 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Regina Marsikova | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |